Take a look at the above photos. This is known as the London Hammer, or London Artifact. In June of 1936 Mr. and Mrs. Max Hahn were hiking along the Red Creek near the small town of London, Texas, and found a small rock nodule with a piece of wood protruding from it. Later on, Max Hahn's son George broke open the rock and found the rest of the hammer, surrounded by a solid mass of cretaceous rock. The handle was partially PETRIFIED. The Hahns filed the metal to see if it was really metal; the spot has not rusted yet, even though it has been about forty-five years. The hammer contains 96% iron, 2.6% chlorine, and 0.74% sulfur. The question is: is this hammer a hoaz? Numerous studies have concluded that it is not. What is its significance? That the rock/fossilization time frame cannot be as old as evolutionists and still coincide with their estimate of the origin of man. This hammer was supposed ly found in the Cretaceous layer, opening the argument that the introduction of mankind was not as old as evolutionists say.
Take a look at the information about this intriguing find.
A good reference page start would include:
